Post by account_disabled on Aug 30, 2023 4:50:26 GMT -5
The general planning of the building will be developed in such a way that the stiffness and mass distribution of the load-bearing structure can best resist the action of forces. For this purpose, it is stated that the symmetrical construction scheme should be used, and the load from the pavement and the structure, and the incoming mass and stiffness of the structure should be evenly distributed.
- Kazakh scientist I.E. Itskov, in his analysis [1] after the devastating earthquake in Turkey on August 19, 1999, stated that "...no less than 90 percent of the buildings in the areas most affected by the earthquake did not conform to the principles of earthquake-resistant construction in terms of structural solutions.. .” is stated.
This shows that during a strong earthquake, most of the buildings with structural solutions that do not meet the requirements of the norms are more likely to be damaged.
Chapter 8 of the academic work [ 13 ], which was a comprehensive study of the 1986 earthquake in the Carpathians, its consequences, and the state of collapse and damage of buildings in the Carpathians in 1986. Section 8.1 "Analysis of Qatar Mobile Number List Damaged Buildings" of "Lessons from Earthquake" specifies the basic requirements for earthquake-resistant buildings, as well as the requirements and recommendations of the norms, volume planning and design requirements, and the buildings that have been calculated according to the norms are sometimes called "normative". . On the other hand, "non-standard" buildings should be designed based on additional recommendations and special analysis that are not specified in the standard. - is specifically stated.
At the meeting of the professional council, the members were divided in their opinions, senior engineer Ts. Sharaa and E. Ganzorig, construction teachers of TIS, Ph.D. It was decided that the planning can be left by taking additional measures. In this way, in our country, the way for the design of buildings with "non-standard" planning in the future remains free.
Some of the qualified and consulting engineers, and even some members of the professional council, have a tendency to believe that the implementation of the earthquake code is a matter of the engineer's will, and that the result of the calculation is sufficient. It is a pity that there is a lack of ethics to correct the mistakes that have been planned. In 1990, when the big drawing institutes of our country were broken up into many small companies, the technical policy was lost, and the words of experienced engineers were lost. "- not only did they start planning "irregular" buildings while keeping their mouths shut, but they also developed blueprints with "irregular" plans that are used repeatedly in the same style, and buildings are still being built using them in many places, and now some high-cast cast iron buildings are being built "irregularly" without conforming to the principles of earthquake-resistant construction - is planned by Researchers warn that when a strong earthquake occurs, these "irregular" buildings will face the same fate as buildings that have been destroyed by catastrophic earthquakes around the world.
- Kazakh scientist I.E. Itskov, in his analysis [1] after the devastating earthquake in Turkey on August 19, 1999, stated that "...no less than 90 percent of the buildings in the areas most affected by the earthquake did not conform to the principles of earthquake-resistant construction in terms of structural solutions.. .” is stated.
This shows that during a strong earthquake, most of the buildings with structural solutions that do not meet the requirements of the norms are more likely to be damaged.
Chapter 8 of the academic work [ 13 ], which was a comprehensive study of the 1986 earthquake in the Carpathians, its consequences, and the state of collapse and damage of buildings in the Carpathians in 1986. Section 8.1 "Analysis of Qatar Mobile Number List Damaged Buildings" of "Lessons from Earthquake" specifies the basic requirements for earthquake-resistant buildings, as well as the requirements and recommendations of the norms, volume planning and design requirements, and the buildings that have been calculated according to the norms are sometimes called "normative". . On the other hand, "non-standard" buildings should be designed based on additional recommendations and special analysis that are not specified in the standard. - is specifically stated.
At the meeting of the professional council, the members were divided in their opinions, senior engineer Ts. Sharaa and E. Ganzorig, construction teachers of TIS, Ph.D. It was decided that the planning can be left by taking additional measures. In this way, in our country, the way for the design of buildings with "non-standard" planning in the future remains free.
Some of the qualified and consulting engineers, and even some members of the professional council, have a tendency to believe that the implementation of the earthquake code is a matter of the engineer's will, and that the result of the calculation is sufficient. It is a pity that there is a lack of ethics to correct the mistakes that have been planned. In 1990, when the big drawing institutes of our country were broken up into many small companies, the technical policy was lost, and the words of experienced engineers were lost. "- not only did they start planning "irregular" buildings while keeping their mouths shut, but they also developed blueprints with "irregular" plans that are used repeatedly in the same style, and buildings are still being built using them in many places, and now some high-cast cast iron buildings are being built "irregularly" without conforming to the principles of earthquake-resistant construction - is planned by Researchers warn that when a strong earthquake occurs, these "irregular" buildings will face the same fate as buildings that have been destroyed by catastrophic earthquakes around the world.